Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 21;5(2):e001108. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001108

Table 4.

Comparison of treatment modalities between r-axSpA and nr-axSpA: pooled analysis

Variable N studies r-axSpA nr-axSpA Rr (95% CI) P value I2
N patients Pooled percentage (95% CI) N patients Pooled percentage (95% CI)
NSAIDs 13 3365 73.5%
(63.1 to 81.8)
1727 69.1%
(55.5 to 80.0)
1.04
(0.96 to 1.12)
0.379 79.8%
csDMARDs 12 3179 29.6%
(20.5 to 39.9)
1355 28.5%
(21.9 to 36.2)
1.04
(0.83 to 1.29)
0.726 75.5%
bDMARDs 9 3834 28.7%
(19.7 to 39.7)
1318 26.2%
(16.1 to 39.6)
1.08
(0.89 to 1.32)
0.444 71.0%
Systemic glucocorticoids 8 2769 8.5%
(5.2 to 13.4)
903 10.1%
(8.2 to 12.3)
0.93
(0.73 to 1.18)
0.547 38.6%

1/13 studies for NSAIDs outcome are from RCTs; 1/12 studies for csDMARDs outcome are from RCTs; 1/9 studies for bDMARDs outcome are from RCTs; 0/8 studies for Systemic glucocorticoids are from RCTs.

bDMARD, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; csDMARD, synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; nr-axSpA, non-radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; r-axSpA, radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis; RR, relative risk.