Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Educ Psychol. 2019 Jan 7;56:250–261. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.002

Table 4.

Fit indices for Model 1 and Model 2. Fit indices for the multigroup analyses and partial invariance.

χ2 df p χ2/ df CFI RMSEA LO90 HI90 TLI Δ CFI
Model 1 Total Sample 27.857 15 .022 1.857 .998 .025 .009 .040 .994 -
GR 20.687 15 .147 1.38 .996 .022 .000 .042 .991 -
PR 14.2 15 .510 0.947 1.00 .000 .000 .039 1.00 -
Model 2 Total Sample 19.659 15 .185 1.311 .999 .015 .000 .032 .999 -
GR 17.22 15 .306 1.148 .998 .014 .000 .037 .996 -
PR 9.677 15 .840 0.645 1.00 .000 .000 .024 1.00 -
Multigroup Baseline 34.897 30 .246 1.163 .998 .011 .000 .024 .995 -
Model 1 Loadings RSN - PP - OP 37.037 33 .288 1.122 .998 .010 .000 .023 .996 .000
Structural Paths 78.881 41 .000 1.924 .985 .026 .017 .035 .975 .020
Path from WA to ORF 35.211 31 .276 1.136 .998 .010 .000 .024 .996 .001
Path from WU to ORF 40.299 31 .122 1.200 .996 .015 .000 .027 .991 .004
Multigroup Baseline 26.896 30 .629 0.897 1.00 .000 .000 .018 1.00 -
Model 2 Loadings RSN - PP - OP 28.546 33 .689 0.865 1.00 .000 .000 .016 1.00 .000
Structural Paths 72.166 41 .002 1.760 .996 .024 .014 .033 .975 .004
Path from PWA to ORF 27.227 31 .658 0.880 1.00 .000 .000 .017 1.00 .000
Path from WU to ORF 32.205 31 .407 1.039 .999 .005 .000 .021 .999 .001

Note: GR = good readers; PR = poor readers. Model 1 = rapid serial naming (RSN), phonological processing (PP), and orthographic processing (OP) as concurrent predictors of the performance on oral reading fluency (ORF)mediated by word reading accuracy (WA). Model 2: rapid serial naming (RSN), orthographic processing (OP), and phonological processing (PP) as concurrent predictors of the performance on oral reading fluency (ORF) mediated by pseudoword reading accuracy (PWA). CFI = Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation and the confidence interval of 90%; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index.