Table 2.
Network analysis results
| Combined-network | Glomeromycotina-only | Mucoromycotina-only | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. liverwort species | 23 | 18 | 14 |
| No. fungal taxa (incl. singletons) | 51 | 30 | 21 |
| Total no. associations | 148 | 69 | 79 |
| Connectance | 8% | 11% | 13% |
| Nestedness | |||
| NODFfull | 14.68 | 18.36 | 13.44 |
| Nested? | Yes (p = 0.018) | No (p = 0.087) | No (p = 0.23) |
| NODFplants | 12.50 | 19.53 | 9.65 |
| Nested? | Yes (p = 0.0065) | Yes (p = 0.0005) | No (p = 0.11) |
| NODFfungi | 15.12 | 17.95 | 15.08 |
| Nested? | Yes (p < 0.00001) | Yes (p = 0.0012) | No (p = 0.27) |
| T | 17.8° | 18.09° | 31.45° |
| Nested? | Yes (p = 0.0069) | Yes (p = 0.0010) | No (p = 0.30) |
| BR | 69 | 37 | 24 |
| Nested? | No (p = 0.068) | Yes (p = 0.040) | No (p = 0.16) |
| Modularity | |||
| No. modules | 10 | 8 | 6 |
| Modularity score | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.62 |
| Significant? | No (p = 0.06) | No (p = 0.42) | No (p = 0.29) |
The programs ANINHADO and NeD produced the same results for nestedness and significance so only the results of NeD are presented with the exception of NODFfull, where the p value from ANINHADO is included, as this cannot be calculated by NeD