Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 3;9:18150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54548-6

Table 2.

Classification performances (%).

Task Method #params ACC (%) SEN (%) SPE (%)
AD vs. NC Hosseini-Asl et al. 2018 ~9,100 K 80.23 ± 4.57 82.97 77.60
Korolev et al. 2017 ~5,610 K 76.53 ± 7.47 79.38 73.93
Rieke et al. 2018 ~5,324 K 74.30 ± 6.34 76.21 72.50
CNNs (Scratch) ~1,446 K 75.75 ± 6.08 81.45 73.16
CAE ~1,446 K 85.24 ± 3.97 88.28 82.39
ICAE ~371 K 86.60 ± 3.66 88.55 84.54
pMCI vs. NC Hosseini-Asl et al. 2018 ~9,100 K 71.01 ± 5.47 74.11 67.91
Korolev et al. 2017 ~5,610 K 68.85 ± 6.73 72.59 65.51
Rieke et al. 2018 ~5,324 K 69.95 ± 4.94 71.97 77.45
CNNs (Scratch) ~1,446 K 68.12 ± 5.88 75.42 60.91
CAE ~1,446 K 76.57 ± 3.96 82.66 70.03
ICAE ~371 K 77.37 ± 3.55 81.03 74.07
sMCI vs. NC Hosseini-Asl et al. 2018 ~9,100 K 61.79 ± 4.44 61.98 61.61
Korolev et al. 2017 ~5,610 K 60.84 ± 5.23 62.23 59.56
Rieke et al. 2018 ~5,324 K 61.19 ± 4.89 63.04 69.37
CNNs (Scratch) ~1,446 K 59.50 ± 5.84 61.47 57.74
CAE ~1,446 K 62.83 ± 5.17 66.07 60.02
ICAE ~371 K 63.04 ± 4.16 59.02 67.11
pMCI vs. AD Hosseini-Asl et al. 2018 ~9,100 K 60.83 ± 5.41 60.99 60.65
Korolev et al. 2017 ~5,610 K 59.24 ± 4.89 62.88 56.18
Rieke et al. 2018 ~5,324 K 60.53 ± 5.11 64.31 56.97
CNNs (Scratch) ~1,446 K 55.62 ± 5.84 55.15 56.13
CAE ~1,446 K 59.47 ± 6.32 60.00 58.92
ICAE ~371 K 60.97 ± 5.33 64.53 56.13
sMCI vs. AD Hosseini-Asl et al. 2018 ~9,100 K 67.69 ± 6.41 69.58 65.63
Korolev et al. 2017 ~5,610 K 70.64 ± 5.83 70.08 71.28
Rieke et al. 2018 ~5,324 K 65.68 ± 4.19 61.33 69.44
CNNs (Scratch) ~1,446 K 63.39 ± 7.14 66.31 60.12
CAE ~1,446 K 74.68 ± 6.04 75.20 74.07
ICAE ~371 K 75.06 ± 3.86 76.55 73.39