Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 25;27(12):621–628. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-01336-6

Table 2.

Comparison of the 82Rb-PET imaging and CCTA results between athletes with concordant abnormal ET and MPS results and the matched individuals with low-to-intermediate risk of CAD

Athletes (N = 9) Control (N = 9) p-value
Resting coronary blood flow (ml/g/min)
LAD  1.1 ± 0.4  0.8 ± 0.2 0.052
RCx  1.0 ± 0.3  0.8 ± 0.2 0.143
RCA  0.9 ± 0.3  0.7 ± 0.2 0.104
Global  1.1 ± 0.3  0.8 ± 0.2 0.068
Corrected global flow  1.0 ± 0.2  0.9 ± 0.1 0.218
Maximum coronary blood flow (ml/g/min)
LAD  3.5 ± 0.8  3.2 ± 0.6 0.349
RCx  3.0 ± 0.6  3.2 ± 0.4 0.262
RCA  3.1 ± 0.8  3.2 ± 0.5 0.741
Global  3.2 ± 0.7  3.2 ± 0.5 0.841
Coronary flow reserve (ml/g/min)
LAD  3.3 ± 0.9  4.1 ± 0.7 0.080
RCx  3.1 ± 0.7  4.1 ± 0.5 0.003
RCA  3.4 ± 0.8  4.5 ± 0.6 0.004
Global  3.3 ± 0.8  4.2 ± 0.6 0.014
Corrected CFR  3.2 ± 0.6  3.9 ± 0.6 0.045
CACS 61.1 ± 157.5 33.3 ± 50.0 0.621
CCTA
No epicardial CAD, N (%)  9 (100)  9 (100) 1.000

PET positron emission tomography, ET exercise test, MP myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, CAD coronary artery disease, LAD left anterior descending artery, RCX circumflex artery, RCA right coronary artery, CFR coronary flow reserve, CACS coronary artery calcium score, CCTA coronary computed tomography angiography