Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;19:100166. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2019.100166

Table 2.

Neuropsychological test performance in violent and nonviolent patients with psychotic disorders.



Unadjusted M (SD)
Adjusted M (SE)a



Targeted cognitive function Neuropsychological test V (n = 183) NV (n = 708) V (n = 183) NV (n = 708) F (df1, df2) p ηp2
Executive functions
 Inhibition CPT-HQb 0.01 (0.52) 0.00 (0.55) 0.02 (0.04) −0.01 (0.02) 0.33 (1, 782) ns <.001
Number of hits 26.1 (3.0) 26.4 (2.8)
Mean reaction time hitsc 44.0 (8.3) 42.8 (8.7)
Number of commission errors 2.6 (10.8) 3.0 (15.3)
 Cognitive flexibility RSTb −0.05 (0.79) 0.01 (0.75) −0.06 (0.06) 0.02 (0.03) 1.27 (1, 758) ns .002
Accuracy cost 24.4 (25.5) 22.2 (23.6)
Reaction time costc 26.2 (18.9) 25.3 (18.9)
 Fluid intelligence WAIS-III block design subtest 38.2 (17.5) 41.0 (16.9) 37.8 (1.3) 41.1 (0.7) 5.12 (1, 847) .024 .006
 Planning NAB mazes testd 15.9 (6.5) 17.0 (6.3) 15.6 (0.6) 17.1 (0.3) 5.32 (1, 499) .022 .011
Theory of mind
 Affective DFAR 69.1 (10.2) 68.9 (10.7) 69.0 (0.8) 68.9 (0.4) 0.01 (1, 761) ns <.001
 Cognitive Hinting task 17.0 (2.9) 17.7 (2.7) 17.0 (0.2) 17.7 (0.1) 9.38 (1, 839) .002 .011

M, mean; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; V, violent; NV, nonviolent; df, degrees of freedom; CPT-HQ, Continuous Performance Test-HQ; ns, nonsignificant; RST, Response Shifting Task; WAIS-III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition; NAB, Neuropsychological Assessment Battery; DFAR, Degraded Facial Affect Recognition Task.

Due to missing data, the total number of patients varies per test.

a

Adjusted for age and sex.

b

Average of subscale z-scores.

c

In centiseconds.

d

Administered six years after baseline.