Table 2.
Intention to treat analysis of primary and secondary outcomes for a nationwide online randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a crowdsourced intervention on hepatitis test uptake among men who have sex with men in China, 2018.
Total | Intervention | Control | ||||||||
(n = 556) | (n = 280) | (n = 276) | ||||||||
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | OR1 | 95% CI | OR2 | 95% CI | |
Primary Outcome | ||||||||||
Confirmed HBV and HCV test uptake | 44 | 7•9% | 22 | 7•9% | 22 | 8•0% | 0•98 | 0•53–1•82 | 1•46 | 0•72–2•95 |
Secondary Outcomes | ||||||||||
Self-reported HBV and HCV test uptake | 97 | 17•4% | 45 | 16•1% | 52 | 18•8% | 0•82 | 0•53–1•28 | 0•94 | 0•57–1•55 |
Confirmed HBV test uptake | 48 | 8•6% | 23 | 8•2% | 25 | 9•1% | 0•90 | 0•50–1•62 | 1•29 | 0•66–2•51 |
Confirmed HCV test uptake | 44 | 7•9% | 22 | 7•9% | 22 | 8•0% | 0•98 | 0•53–1•82 | 1•46 | 0•72–2•95 |
Self-reported HBV test uptake | 124 | 22•3% | 59 | 21•1% | 65 | 23•6% | 0•87 | 0•58–1•29 | 0•94 | 0•60–1•49 |
Self-reported HCV test uptake | 103 | 18•5% | 48 | 17•1% | 55 | 19•9% | 0•83 | 0•54–1•28 | 0•96 | 0•59–1•58 |
HBV vaccination uptake | 39 | 7•0% | 18 | 6•4% | 21 | 7•6% | 0•83 | 0•43–1•60 | 0•94 | 0•43–2•06 |
HIV test uptake | 217 | 39•0% | 114 | 40•7% | 103 | 37•3% | 1•15 | 0•82–1•62 | 1•41 | 0•95–2•08 |
Chlamydia test uptake | 27 | 4•9% | 14 | 5•0% | 13 | 4•7% | 1•06 | 0•49–2•31 | 1•36 | 0•62–2•96 |
Gonorrhea test uptake | 35 | 6•3% | 17 | 6•1% | 18 | 6•5% | 0•93 | 0•47–1•84 | 1•06 | 0•51–2•20 |
Syphilis test uptake | 116 | 20•9% | 62 | 22•1% | 54 | 19•6% | 1•17 | 0•78–1•76 | 1•44 | 0•90–2•30 |
Visit with a physician after hepatitis test | 53 | 9•5% | 27 | 9•6% | 26 | 9•4% | 1•03 | 0•58–1•81 | 1•07 | 0•55–2•05 |
1 Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for intention to treat analysis using a missing=failure approach to account for men lost to follow-up.
2 Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for intention to treat analysis using multiple imputation to account for men lost to follow-up.