Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 9;71(4):338–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2019.09.006

Table 3.

Comparison of echocardiographic abnormalities among cases and controls.

Echocardiographic abnormality Cases (n = 200) Controls (n = 50) P value
LV diastolic dysfunction 78 (39%) 4 (8%) <0.0001
Valvular regurgitation (MR, AR, PR, TR) 61 (30.5%) 5 (10%) 0.002
Reduced FS(<30%) 64 (32%) 2 (4%) <0.0001
Reduced LVEF 32 (16%) 2 (4%) 0.035
Dilated cardiomyopathy 24 (12%) 1 (2%) 0.035
Pulmonary hypertension 30 (15%) 3 (6%) 0.106
Regional wall motion abnormality 2 (1%) 0 (0%) 1.0
Pericardial effusion 14 (7%) 0 (0%) 0.079

MR, mitral regurgitation; AR, aortic regurgitation; PR, pulmonary regurgitation; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; FS, fractional shortening; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.