Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;39(12):2419–2432. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18797343

Table 1.

The percentage of the variation explained using increasing number of principal components following PCA on the CR[t=0,60] of 39 optimisation set subjects.

Number of components (L) Variation described (%)
1 76.4
2 95.0
3 97.8
4 99.1
5 99.6
6 99.9