Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;5(4):2055217319887191. doi: 10.1177/2055217319887191

Table 2.

Mean change in PROs from baseline to 12 months.

Measure Description Component
Mean (SD) change from baseline to Month 12
Improved Stable Worsened p-value
MSIS-29a 20 items assess physical impact of MS in terms of mobility and self-care Physical impactn = 868 +–3.0 (14.1) <0.0001
9 items assess psychological impact of MS Psychological impactn = 860 +–8.0 (18.6) <0.0001
MFIS-5b 5 items assess how fatigue impacts patients’ lives n = 867 +–1.7 (3.8) <0.0001
TSQM-14c 14 items assess patient treatment satisfaction Effectivenessn = 492 +14.4 (29.5) <0.0001
Side effectsn = 500 +25.4 (31.4) <0.0001
Conveniencen = 505 +33.4 (25.7) <0.0001
Global scoren = 511 +21.8 (26.9) <0.0001
EQ-5D-5Ld 5 items assess mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression EQ-5Dn = 792 +0.02 (0.1) <0.0001
EQ-5D VASn = 803 +3.7 (15.9) <0.0001
PRIMUS activity limitationse 15 items assess activities of daily living n = 545 ±–0.14 (3.2) 0.2134
WPAI-MSf 6 items assess the number of work hours missed, impact on productivity, and daily activities during past 7 days Work impairmentfn = 327 +–2.2 (19.5) 0.008
Activity impairmentn = 851 +–4.2 (22.3) <0.0001
BDI-Fast Screeng 7 items assess depression during the past 2 weeks n = 854 +–0.8 (2.5) <0.0001
EDSSh Assesses disease progression n = 940 ±–0.05 (0.65) 0.0136

BDI-Fast Screen: Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen; EDSS: Expanded Disability Status Scale; EQ-5D-5L: EuroQol-5D 5-level version; MFIS-5: Modified Fatigue Impact Scale 5-item version; MSIS-29, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale; PRIMUS: Patient-Reported Indices for Multiple Sclerosis; PRO: patient-reported outcome; TSQM-14: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication; WPAI-MS: Work Productivity and Activity Impairment for Multiple Sclerosis.

Mean change in PROs from baseline to 12 months was assessed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

aLower score indicates better outcome; range, 0–100 (scores were transformed).

bLower score indicates improved functioning; range, 0–20.

cHigher score indicates greater satisfaction; range, 0–100; only patients with previous treatment were assessed.

dHigher score indicates better health; range, 0–100.

eHigher score indicates better outcome; range, 0–30.

fHigher score indicates higher impairment and lower productivity; scores are only reported for patients who were employed at the time of PRO administration.

gLower score indicates less severe depressive symptoms; range, 0–21.

hLower score indicates less severe disability symptoms; range, 0–10.