Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 4;19:1089. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6279-8

Table 4.

Factors associated with uptake and retention to the weight loss programmes using multivariable analysis

Study-1: Women informed of their breast cancer risk prior to invite to the weight loss programme Study-2: Women informed of their breast cancer risk part way through the weight loss programme
Uptake Retention Uptake Retention
Odds ratio
(95% CI)
P value Odds ratio
(95% CI)
P value Odds ratio
(95% CI)
P value Odds ratio
(95% CI)
P value
Breast Cancer Risk: High and moderately increased vs. low 1.99 (1.24 to 3.17) 0.004 2.98 (1.05 to 8.47) 0.041 3.58 (1.59 to 8.07) 0.002 3.88 (1.07 to 14.04) 0.039
Age per year 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96) 0.000 1.15 (1.03 to 1.28) 0.011 0.92 (0.80 to 1.07) 0.265 1.09 (0.92 to 1.30) 0.331
Index of multiple deprivation: Townsend quintile 1 vs. 3,4,5 2.1 (1.3to 3.3) 0.009 0.264 (0.076 to 0.920) 0.050 Not included in the model Not included in the model
Townsend quintile 2 vs. 3,4,5 1.8 (1.0 to 3.0) 0.234 (0.069 to 0.799) Not included in the model Not included in the model
Time since receiving risk feedback (months) 1.00 (0.99 to 1.0) 0.387 Not included in the model N/A N/A
Smoker vs. non-smoker No smoking data on women who did not join the study 0.045 (0.006 to 0.353) 0.003 Not included in the model Not included in the model
BMI per unit increase Not included in the model 0.82 (0.73 to 0.92) 0.001 Not included in the model Not included in the model

a Townsend quintile; 1 is the least deprived. N/A not applicable as risk feedback was received after women had decided to join Study 2. Figures in bold indicate significance (P value ≤ 0.05)