Table 4.

Relationship functioning as a predictor of miscellaneous recreational drug use

	Drug Use Instances
	B	95% CI	β
Rewards
Actor	0.27**	(0.19, 0.36)	.56
Partner	0.22**	(0.13, 0.31)	.45
Costs
Actor	0.07*	(0.01, 0.13)	.21
Partner	0.04	(−0.02, 0.09)	.10
Comparison
Actor	−0.16**	(−0.22, −0.09)	−.35
Partner	−0.06	(−0.13, 0.01)	−.14
Alternatives
Actor	−0.15**	(−0.21, −0.08)	−.35
Partner	−0.02	(−0.08, 0.04)	−.06
Investment
Actor	−0.14**	(−0.25, −0.03)	−.21
Partner	0.07	(−0.04, 0.19)	.11
Barriers
Actor	0.12**	(0.06, 0.18)	.27
Partner	0.02	(−0.03, 0.08)	−05
Age
Actor	0.02	(−0.003, 0.04)	.09
Partner	0.07**	(0.05, 0.09)	.36
Race
Actor	0.33	(−0.08, 0.74)	.14
Partner	0.08	(−0.32, 0.48)	.04
HIV status
Actor	−0.04	(−0.60, 0.51)	−.01
Partner	−2.56**	(−3.46, −1.65)	−.58
Relationship Length	−0.04**	(−0.05, −0.03)	−1.04
Sexual Arrangement
Monogamish	0.65**	(0.34, 0.97)	.28
Open	0.56**	(0.26, 0.86)	.30
Discrepant	0.04	(−0.53, 0.62)	.01

^*p < .05;

^**p < .01