Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 3):401–408. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10443-0_51

Table 1.

Comparison of classification performances (%) of the competing methods

Feature Method AD vs. NC MCI vs. NC MCI-C vs. MCI-NC
ACC SEN SPE AUC ACC SEN SPE AUC ACC SEN SPE AUC
MRI MRI-N 89.5 82.7 86.3 95.3 68.3 92.6 39.2 82.5 60.3 15.5 92.3 68.7
MRI-S 91.2 85.9 92.5 96.7 76.7 93.3 37.6 83.7 64.5 24.9 95.8 70.6
HOGM 93.4 89.5 92.5 97.1 77.7 95.6 51.4 84.4 66.8 36.7 95.0 72.2
M3T 92.6 87.2 95.9 97.5 78.1 94.5 54.0 83.1 67.1 37.7 92.0 72.5
Proposed 93.7 88.6 97.8 97.6 79.7 94.8 56.9 84.7 71.8 48.0 92.8 81.4

PET PET-N 86.2 83.5 84.8 94.8 69.0 95.0 30.8 77.9 62.2 21.6 93.1 71.3
PET-S 87.9 85.7 90.9 94.7 73.8 96.5 36.2 78.7 65.1 31.0 95.5 73.5
HOGM 91.7 91.1 92.8 95.6 74.7 96.5 43.2 79.3 66.6 35.5 95.5 72.4
M3T 90.9 90.5 93.1 96.4 77.2 94.5 44.3 80.5 67.0 39.1 93.2 73.1
Proposed 91.8 91.5 93.8 96.9 79.2 97.1 45.3 80.8 71.2 47.4 93.0 77.6