Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar;60(4):1213–1223. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25809

Table 2.

Quadrantal Thicknesses of Intraretinal Layers in Patients With RRMS and HCs

Layers
Group
Thickness, μm
I
N
S
T
RNFL RRMS 36.8 ± 4.2 41.8 ± 6.2 36.9 ± 4.8 24.6 ± 2.3
HCs 38.4 ± 4.3 44.0 ± 6.2 39.1 ± 4.0 26.1 ± 3.1
P 0.149 0.156 0.023 0.028
GCIPL RRMS 66.6 ± 5.8 69.8 ± 6.1 66.1 ± 5.9 65.7 ± 5.2
HCs 68.9 ± 4.6 73.9 ± 5.9 69.4 ± 4.5 67.5 ± 5.3
P 0.013 0.001 0.006 0.145
INL RRMS 35.7 ± 2.3 37.8 ± 2.3 36.9 ± 2.1 36.5 ± 2.7
HCs 38.6 ± 2.5 38.6 ± 2.5 36.9 ± 2.1 36.6 ± 2.4
P 0.524 0.081 0.987 0.668
OPL RRMS 18.8 ± 3.6 19.1 ± 2.1 19.2 ± 2.3 19.4 ± 3.7
HCs 19.1 ± 2.3 20.0 ± 3.0 19.3 ± 1.8 19.8 ± 2.9
P 0.395 0.029 0.688 0.469
ONL RRMS 72.9 ± 4.9 78.3 ± 5.4 78.4 ± 6.7 75.1 ± 5.7
HCs 71.7 ± 3.8 76.6 ± 4.9 77.8 ± 4.3 75.3 ± 4.0
P 0.395 0.029 0.688 0.469
PR RRMS 35.6 ± 4.7 37.4 ± 4.1 37.7 ± 4.5 35.8 ± 4.9
HCs 36.2 ± 4.1 37.9 ± 3.7 39.0 ± 5.9 37.4 ± 4.7
P 0.596 0.489 0.109 0.040
TRT RRMS 266.3 ± 13.3 284.1 ± 16.7 275.1 ± 13.9 257.1 ± 13.4
HCs 270.1 ± 10.9 290.8 ± 15.3 281.3 ± 12.9 262.7 ± 12.2
P 0.131 0.044 0.027 0.064
P

values for the comparison between two groups by ANCOVA. I, inferior; N, nasal; S, superior; T, temporal.