Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;10:1110. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01110

Table 3.

Comparison of liver segmentation results.

Model VOE (%) RVD (%) ASD (mm) RMSD (mm) DICE (%)
UNet (Chlebus et al., 2017) 14.21 ± 5.71 –0.05 ± 0.10 4.33 ± 3.39 8.35 ± 7.54 0.923 ± 0.03
ResNet (Han, 2017) 11.65 ± 4.06 –0.03 ± 0.06 3.91 ± 3.95 8.11 ± 9.68 0.938 ± 0.02
Christ (Christ et al., 2016) 10.7 −1.4 1.5 24.0 0.943
X. Li et al. (Li et al., 2018b) 10.20 ± 3.44 −0.01 ± 0.05 4.06 ± 3.85 9.63 ± 10.41 0.947 ± 0.01
H. Jiang et al. (Jiang et al., 2019) 0.945 ± 0.02
Ours 9.52 ± 4.65 0.02 ± 0.07 8.43 ± 9.39 14.21 ± 5.71 0.946 ± 0.03
Li et al. + (Li et al., 2015) 9.15 ± 1.44 −0.07 ± 3.63 1.55 ± 0.39 3.15 ± 0.98
Moghbel + (Moghbel et al., 2016) 5.95 7.49 0.911
Lu et al. + (Lu et al., 2017) 9.36 ± 3.34 0.97 ± 3.26 1.89 ± 1.08 4.15 ± 3.16
X. Li et al. + (Li et al., 2018b) 3.57 ± 1.66 0.01 ± 0.02 1.28 ± 2.02 3.58 ± 6.58 0.982 ± 0.01
Ours + 4.02 ± 1.42 0.02 ± 0.03 1.24 ± 1.02 3.48 ± 4.16 0.984 ± 0.01

+ denotes the method using augmented training dataset; - denotes the unreported result.