Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;8(6):520–530. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1681026

Table 1. Methodological quality of included studies according to Bhandari et al (2003).

Study Primary guidelines Secondary guidelines Results Implications for patient care
Did clinicians face diagnostic uncertainty? Independent blind comparison with a reference standard Did the results of the test influence the decision to perform the reference standard? Were the methods described in sufficient detail to permit replication? Are likelihood ratios of the test being evaluated or data necessary for their calculations provided? Will the reproducibility of the test result and its interpretation be satisfactory in clinical setting?
Bianchi et al (2008) No Indeterminate Yes Yes No No
Borggrefe et al (2015) No Yes No Yes Yes No
Brunner et al (2015) No No N/A Yes No Yes
Cha and Shin (2017) No Yes No Yes Yes No
Dolce et al (2014) No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Ganesh et al (2016) No Yes Indeterminate No Yes Yes
Giugale et al (2017) No Yes No No Yes Yes
Gurbuz et al (2017) No Yes No No No Yes
Haug et al (2013) No Yes No Yes No Yes
Hill et al (2015) No Yes No Yes No Yes
Joseph and Harvey (2011) No No N/A Yes Yes No
Kiyak (2018) No No Indeterminate Yes Yes Yes
Kumar et al (2001) Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Lee et al (2013) No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Marsland et al (2014) No No N/A Yes No No
Oc et al (2018) Yes Yes No Yes No Yes
Ozer and Toker (2011) No No N/A Yes Yes No
Ozer et al (2012) No Yes No Yes No Yes
Pace and Cresswell (2010) Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
Patel et al (2013) No Yes No No No No
Poole et al (2016) No Yes No Yes No Yes
Rausch et al (2015) No No N/A Yes Yes No
Riddick et al (2012) No Yes No No No Yes
Soong et al (2008) No Yes No No Yes Yes
Stoops et al (2017) No Yes No Yes No Yes
Sügün et al (2011) Yes No N/A Yes Yes Yes
Takemoto et al (2012) No Yes No Yes No Yes
Taylor et al (2017) Yes No N/A Yes Yes No
Thomas and Greenberg (2009) No Indeterminate No No No No
Tweet et al (2010) No Yes No No Yes Yes
Vaiss et al (2014) No No No Yes Yes No
Vernet et al (2017) Indeterminate Yes No No No No
Watchmaker et al (2016) No Yes No No Yes Yes
Williams et al (2016) No Yes No No Yes No

Note : Indeterminate: unable to determine based on data provided in article; N/A: not applicable, that is, no reference standard used.