Table 3. Studies reporting on the efficacy for detection of dorsal screw penetration.
Design | N | Outcome | AP + Lat | DTV a | CST | RGV | 3D | US | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients | Screws | % Cases with penetrating screws detected | % Penetrating screws detected | |||||||||
Clinical | Taylor et al (2017) | Retrospective | 25 | Indeterminate | x | 8% | ||||||
Brunner et al (2015) | Prospective | 22 | 93 | X | 11.8% | |||||||
Rausch et al (2015) | Prospective | 48 | 232 | X | 5.2% additional after AP + lat | 4.3% additionally after DTV(1 intra articular) | ||||||
Marsland et al (2014) | Prospective | 42 | Indeterminate | x | X | Cases: 14% Screws:17% (1 intra articular) | ||||||
Vaiss et al (2014) | Retrospective | 75 | 300 | x | X | 0% | Cases: 14.7% Screws: 5% | |||||
Lee et al (2013) | Prospective | 91 | Indeterminate | x | 0% | 14% | ||||||
Sügün et al (2011) | Indeterminate | 46 | 230 | X | 25.7% | |||||||
Joseph and Harvey (2011) | Retrospective | 15 | Indeterminate | x | 26.7% | |||||||
Ozer and Toker (2011) | Indeterminate | 27 | 125 | X | 6.4% | 8.8% |
Abbreviations: 3D, three-dimensional fluoroscopy; AP, anteroposterior; CST, carpal shoot through; DTV, dorsal tangential view; lat, lateral; N , number; RGV, radial groove view; US, ultrasound.
We interpreted the Hoya view, skyline view, and dorsal horizon view to be the same as the dorsal tangential view.