Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 20;29(4):397–420. doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09417-4

Table 1.

Differences between visuospatial neglect symptoms and homonymous hemianopia

Visuospatial neglect Homonymous hemianopia
Lesions Fronto-parietal lesions (mainly territory of middle cerebral artery). Postchiasmatic lesions of the visual tract or occipital lesions (mainly territory of posterior cerebral artery).
Awareness for deficits Awareness for deficits is reduced (anosognosia), contralesional parts of the body, the external and internal world seem not to exist anymore. Anosodiaphoria can occur. Awareness for deficits can be reduced initially but improves quickly. Anosognosia and anosodiaphoria are rare.
Modalities Multimodal deficits can occur (visual, auditory, tactile, motor, olfactory). Restricted to deficits of the visual modality.
Visual behaviour Lack of attention to contralesional hemispace, independent of gaze direction. Deviation of gaze, head and sometime upper body towards the ipsilesional side. Reduced eye contact with conversational partner. Loss of contralesional visual field with respect to the position of the head and eyes. Compensational eye and head movements towards the contralesional hemispace.
Drawing and cancellation Contralesional omissions in drawing or cancellation tests. Drawing and cancellation tests are mostly unaffected.
Line bisection Ipsilesional deviation. Contralesional deviation occurs frequently.
Attention (Posner paradigm) Attentional shift is impaired. Attentional shift is not impaired.
Compensation Cueing on the contralesional side can lead to a transient improvement. Compensation of visual deficits with head- and eye-movements occurs spontaneously (over-compensation may occur). Cueing does not have an impact.
Central fixation Difficulty in maintaining central fixation. Central fixation is not impaired.
VEPs Near normal response of VEPs. Prolonged latency can occur on affected side. Different response of VEPs in ipsi- and contralesional visual field.
Extinction Visual extinction is commonly associated. Visual extinction is not commonly associated.

Adapted from (Kerkhoff & Schindler, 1997) and (Ting et al., 2011)

VEP Visually evoked potential