Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Aug 2;74:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.037

Table 4.

Nested Logit Models of Cannabis Flower Preference: Past-year Nonusers Only, by Former Use.

Attributes Never Users
Former Users
Never Users
Former Users
Coefficient Estimate (95% CI) Willingness to Pay Estimate ($) (95% CI)

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Level, dichotomous
 15% (reference)
 20% .020 (−.0072, .048) .0073 (−.035, .049) 2.40 (−.32, 5.13) .42 (−2.01, 2.86)
 30% .016 (−.018, .052) .064 (−.00094, .12) 1.96 (−1.92, 5.85) 3.72 (.028, 7.41)

Cannabidiol (CBD) Level, dichotomous
 0% (reference)
 0.4% .045* (.0093, .081) .087** (.031, .14) 5.32 (1.78, 8.86) 5.06 (2.26, 7.87)
 15% .17*** (.070, .27) .37*** (.25, .49) 19.98 (14.10, 25.87) 21.82 (16.90, 26.75)

Warning Message, dichotomous
 None (reference)
 Text warning .021 (−.024, .067) −.041 (−.10, .019) 2.53 (−2.74, 7.81) −2.43 (−5.85, .99)
 Graphic warning on drugged driving .078** (.023, .13) .012 (−.048, .072) 9.15 (4.45, 13.85) .71 (−2.79, 4.22)
 FDA disclaimer −.010 (−.055, .034) −.070* (−.13, −.0080) −1.23 (−6.44, 3.96) −4.11 (−7.58, −.64)

Price, continuous −.0085*** (−.013, −.0037) −.017*** (−.022, −.012)


Number of Respondents 625 561
Number of Choice Scenarios 7,500 6,732
Number of Choice Alternatives 30,000 26,928
*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001