Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 1;11(11):2611. doi: 10.3390/nu11112611

Table 3.

GRADE assessment for the effect of lifestyle changes on T2D risk.

Outcome No. of Studies Study Design Certainty Assessment RR [95% CI] Certainty
Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other Considerations
T2D risk reduction Seven randomized trials not serious not serious a not serious not serious none 0.53 [0.41, 0.67] ⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH

CI = confidence interval; GRADE = grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation; RR = risk ratio; T2D = type 2 diabetes. a Although there was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 65%, p = 0.01), the removal of one study [34] explained some of the heterogeneity, which changed it from significant to non-significant (I2 = 36%, p = 0.16). However, the estimate of effect did not change appreciably. Furthermore, this inconsistency was not considered serious as the magnitude of effect remained large and in the same direction across all the studies (RR < 0.72).