Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 4;11(11):2657. doi: 10.3390/nu11112657

Table 2.

Influence analysis in meta-analysis using leave-one-out method (random effect).

Meta-Analysis for:
Effect Size (%Heterogeneity)
ID Omitting KN n CDAI CRP ESR
1 M.H. Giaffer et al. 1990 Pol 14 13.0 (96.8%)
2 M.H. Giaffer et al. 1990 Elm 16 13.1 (93.7%)
3 D. Rigaud et al. 1991 Pol 15 11.2 (97.6%)
4 D. Rigaud et al. 1991 Elm 15 10.4 (97.6%)
5 F. Glez.-Huix et al. 1993 Pol 15 20.0 (97.4%) 11.1 (97.6%)
6 D. Royall et al. 1994 Elm 19 22.2 (95.1%)
7 D. Royall et al. 1994 Pol 21 22.3 (97.4%)
8 Teahon K et al. 1995 Elm 19 11.0 (97.6%)
9 S. Verma et al. 2000 Pol 10 136.9 (94.0%) 17.5 (97.3%) 11.5 (97.6%)
10 S. Verma et al. 2000 Elm 11 128.0 (97.2%) 21.9 (97.6%) 10.9 (97.6%)
11 D. M. Wiese et al. 2011 Pol 20 162.3 (97.8%)
12 Yun Feng et al. 2013 Pol 8 150.3 (97.9%) 19.7 (96.6%)
13 Zhen Guo et al. 2013 Pol 13 146.7 (97.8%) 19.6 (97.5%) 10.4 (97.6%)
14 Dong Hu et al. 2014 Elm 59 162.7 (92.6%) 21.5 (97.4%) 9.8 (91.2%)
15 C. Walton et al. 2016 Elm 17 20.1 (97.6%)
Pooled estimate 145.7 (97.4%) 20.5 (97.2%) 11.3 (97.4%)

KN: Kind of nutrition; Pol: Polymeric nutrition; Elm: Elemental nutrition; CDAI: Crohn’s disease activity index; VHAI: Van Hees activity index; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.