Table 2.
Meta-Analysis for: Effect Size (%Heterogeneity) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID | Omitting | KN | n | CDAI | CRP | ESR |
1 | M.H. Giaffer et al. 1990 | Pol | 14 | 13.0 (96.8%) | ||
2 | M.H. Giaffer et al. 1990 | Elm | 16 | 13.1 (93.7%) | ||
3 | D. Rigaud et al. 1991 | Pol | 15 | 11.2 (97.6%) | ||
4 | D. Rigaud et al. 1991 | Elm | 15 | 10.4 (97.6%) | ||
5 | F. Glez.-Huix et al. 1993 | Pol | 15 | 20.0 (97.4%) | 11.1 (97.6%) | |
6 | D. Royall et al. 1994 | Elm | 19 | 22.2 (95.1%) | ||
7 | D. Royall et al. 1994 | Pol | 21 | 22.3 (97.4%) | ||
8 | Teahon K et al. 1995 | Elm | 19 | 11.0 (97.6%) | ||
9 | S. Verma et al. 2000 | Pol | 10 | 136.9 (94.0%) | 17.5 (97.3%) | 11.5 (97.6%) |
10 | S. Verma et al. 2000 | Elm | 11 | 128.0 (97.2%) | 21.9 (97.6%) | 10.9 (97.6%) |
11 | D. M. Wiese et al. 2011 | Pol | 20 | 162.3 (97.8%) | ||
12 | Yun Feng et al. 2013 | Pol | 8 | 150.3 (97.9%) | 19.7 (96.6%) | |
13 | Zhen Guo et al. 2013 | Pol | 13 | 146.7 (97.8%) | 19.6 (97.5%) | 10.4 (97.6%) |
14 | Dong Hu et al. 2014 | Elm | 59 | 162.7 (92.6%) | 21.5 (97.4%) | 9.8 (91.2%) |
15 | C. Walton et al. 2016 | Elm | 17 | 20.1 (97.6%) | ||
Pooled estimate | 145.7 (97.4%) | 20.5 (97.2%) | 11.3 (97.4%) |
KN: Kind of nutrition; Pol: Polymeric nutrition; Elm: Elemental nutrition; CDAI: Crohn’s disease activity index; VHAI: Van Hees activity index; CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate.