Table 3.

Result of MIRU-VNTR typing of selected ten isolates from Uganda-I family cluster

	Isolate ID*
	C1	P1	P 2	P 3	P 4	P 5	P 6	P 7	P 8	P 9
MIRU No.	No of repeats per locus
MIRU 2	2 (508)**	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	Failed
MIRU 4	2 (276)	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	Failed
MIRU 10	6 (802)	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	Failed
MIRU 16	4 (777)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
MIRU 20	3 (668)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed
MIRU 23	7 (518)	7	7	7	7	7	7	7	7	Failed
MIRU 24	2 (501)	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	Failed
MIRU 26	5 (540)	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	Failed
MIRU 27	4 (710)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
MIRU 31	4 (704)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
MIRU 39	3 (699)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed
MIRU 40	4 (570)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
Mtub 04	3 (690)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed
ETR-C	3 (324)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed
Mtub 21	4 (320)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
QUB-11b	4 (353)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
ETR-A	3 (420)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed
Mtub 29	0 (335)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	Failed
Mtub 30	3 (421)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed
ETR-B	3 (518)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed
Mtub 34	4 (542)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
Mtub 39	4 (504)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
QUB 26	4 (631)	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	Failed
QUB4156	3 (345)	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	Failed

*C – Cattle; P - Pastoralist **Base pair corresponding to the number of repeats