Table 8.
Effects of DTMV adoption on hiring labour, 2015 survey, Uganda.
Hired labour (1=yes, 0=Otherwise) (1) | Log of the value of all hired labour (2) | Hiring labour for land preparation (1=yes, 0=Otherwise) (3) | Hiring labour for chemical and fertilizer application and weeding (1=yes, 0=Otherwise) (4) | Hiring labour for harvest, post-harvest, transporting (1=yes, 0=Otherwise) (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTMV adoption | 0.266 (0.215) | 7.39 (4.75) | 0.203 (0.261) | 0.192 (0.278) | 0.088 (0.196) |
Other controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Mean of dependent variable | 0.45 | 1.24 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.30 |
Observations | 840 | 840 | 840 | 840 | 840 |