Table 1.
Initial optimization of on-DNA [3+2] nitrone–olefin cycloaddition
![]() | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
entry | time (h) |
temp (°C) |
MeNHOH (equiv) |
buffer | buffer volsg |
2 (%)h |
1 | 12 | 70 | 25 | Na2HPO4a | 2 | 70 |
2 | 12 | 90 | 25 | Na2HPO4a | 2 | 88 |
3 | 12 | 100 | 25 | Na2HPO4a | 2 | 84f |
4 | 12 | 70 | 25 | pyrrolidineb | 0.1 | 54 |
5 | 12 | 90 | 100 | Na2HPO4a | 2 | 64 |
6 | 4 | 90 | 25 | Na2HPO4a | 0.5 | 86 |
7 | 4 | 90 | 25 | NaH2PO4c | 0.1 | 93 |
8 | 12 | 90 | 25 | NaH2PO4c | 0.5 | 81f |
9 | 4 | 90 | 25 | NaH2PO4d | 2 | 90 |
10 | 4 | 90 | 25 | NaH2PO4d | 8 | 71 |
11 | 4 | 90 | 25 | NaOAce | 2 | 91 |
12 | 4 | 90 | 25 | NaOAce | 8 | >98 |
1.0 M aq buffer (pH 9.2).
0.2 M DMA solution.
1.0 M aq buffer (pH 4.2).
0.1 M aq buffer (pH 5.9).
0.1 M aq buffer (pH 5.0).
Significant DNA damage observed.
Compared to amount of 1 stock solution (0.8 mM) added.
Determined by UPLC-MS.