Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Virol. 2014 Jan 30;86(4):678–686. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23872

TABLE III.

Analyses for Infected Participants Only, Not Adjusted for Age

HSP90 vs.
β-Actin
LEDGF/p75 vs.
β-Actin
P21 vs.
β-Actin
APOBEC3G vs.
β-Actin
Group Total No. (%) Fold
change
P-value Fold
change
P-value Fold
change
P-value Fold
change
P-value
Among infected 33
 Non-viremic 15 (45.4) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Viremic 18 (54.6) −1.48 0.002 −1.15 0.05 1.03 0.94 −1.71 0.34
Among treated 21
 Not on raltegravir 17 (81.0) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Raltegravir 4 (19.0) −1.39 0.19 −1.28 0.04 1.12 0.85 −3.54 0.16
Among non-raltegravir 17
 Not on protease inhibitors 7 (41.2) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 On protease inhibitors 10 (58.8) −1.17 0.49 −1.14 0.21 −1.20 0.71 −3.87 0.07
Among untreated 9
 Viral load 100–1,000 3 (33.3) Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Viral load >1,000 6 (66.7) 1.00 1.00 −1.16 0.36 −2.07 0.36 −4.39 0.28

Note: The fold changes were obtained from the 2−ΔΔCt method and the P-values were obtained from Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Ref, Reference group.