(
A) Heat maps of AWA and AIA responses to AWA::Chrimson stimulation, combined over all experiments. AWA: n = 268; AIA: n = 569. (
B) Delay between the time at which 50% of AWA versus 50% of AIA neurons responded to various stimuli. Delay was greatest for AWA::Chrimson stimulation. Bars are mean ± SEM. (
C) Cumulative response time profiles of AIA responses to 1.15 µM diacetyl recorded immediately after recordings of AWA::Chrimson stimulation (blue), representing a subset of animals used in (
A). AIA responses to 1.15 µM diacetyl combined over all experiments are shown for comparison (black). (
D) Response latencies of 318 AIA responses to AWA::Chrimson stimulation do not correlate with GCaMP fluorescence levels at pre-stimulus baseline. (
E) Response latencies of 31 responses to AWA::Chrimson stimulation do not correlate with Chrimson transgene expression levels. (
F) Representative AIA calcium traces to two pulses of AWA::Chrimson stimulation. AIA can response to the first pulse only, second pulse only, both pulses, or neither pulse. (
G, K, and O) Cumulative response time profiles of AIA responses to the first or second stimulation with AWA::Chrimson (
I), 11.5 nM diacetyl (
L), or 1.15 µM diacetyl (
O). Only animals for which both trial pulses yielded usable results were included (e.g. for AIA::Chrimson, 282/287 animals). All other figures and analyses beyond this supplement pool responses to both pulses. (
H, L, and P) Proportion of animals that respond to only the first, second, both, or neither pulse of stimulation with AWA::Chrimson (
H), 11.5 nM diacetyl (
L), or 1.15 µM diacetyl (
P). Some of the 22% of animals that did not respond to either AWA::Chrimson pulse may be the result of AWA::Chrimson transgene failure (~15% failure rate; see
Figure 1—figure supplement 1E); transgene failure does not explain the large proportion of animals that responded to one of two pulses, nor does it explain variability in response latencies. (
I and J) In 98 animals that responded to both AWA::Chrimson stimulation pulses, there was no correlation between response latencies across pulses (
I), but response magnitudes were correlated across pulses (
J). (
M and N) In 72 animals that responded to both 11.5 µM diacetyl pulses, there was no correlation between response latencies across pulses (
M), but response magnitudes were correlated across pulses (
N). (
Q and R) In 187 animals that responded to both 1.15 µM diacetyl pulses, there was a moderate correlation between response latencies (
Q) and a correlation between response magnitudes (
R) across pulses. Three outlier data points were excluded from (
R) but were included in analysis. For (
C), (
G), (
K), and (
O), asterisks refer to Kolmogorov-Smirnov test significance over full 10 s stimulus pulse. ns: not significant; *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001. See
Supplementary file 2 for sample sizes and test details. For (
D), (
E), (
I), (
J), (
M), (
N), (
Q) and (
R), asterisks refer to significance of linear regression slope differing from 0. ns: not significant; ***: p<0.001.