Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;10:2718. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02718

TABLE 1.

Profile of S. maltophilia isolates from leafy green vegetables and hydroponic farming facilities.

Isolates Source Isolation date API 20 NE profile and significant taxa percentage 16S rDNA sequencing confirmeda Antibiotics resistance statusb
Biofilm-forming abilityc
Aztreonam Ciprofloxacin Norfloxacin Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim
SM-B1 Sweet basil 26/09/2018 0472341, 99.9% Yes R S S S Moderate
SM-B2 Sweet basil 26/09/2018 1472341, 99.9% Yes R S S S Moderate
SM-B3 Sweet basil 08/10/2018 1472341, 99.9% Yes R S S S Strong
SM-B4 Sweet basil 08/10/2018 0472341, 99.9% Yes R S S S Weak
SM-K1 Kale 08/01/2019 0472341, 99.9% S S S S Weak
SM-K2 Kale 08/01/2019 0442341, 79.6% Yes S S S S Weak
SM-K3 Kale 08/01/2019 0442341, 79.6% Yes I S S S Moderate
SM-P1 Parsley 08/01/2019 1472341, 99.9% Yes R S S S Strong
SM-F1 Hydroponic farming facility 22/01/2019 0472341, 99.9% Yes R S S S Strong
SM-F2 Hydroponic farming facility 22/01/2019 0472341, 99.9% R S S S Weak
SM-F3 Hydroponic farming facility 22/01/2019 0432341, 99.9% R S S S Moderate
Reference strain ATCC13637, clinical strain NAd NAd S S S S Strong

aWithin 99.9% identity with NCBI-documented S. maltophilia strains; bS, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant; cBiofilm-forming capacity determined from criteria established by Stepanović et al. (2007) as described in section “Materials and Methods”; results are based on the average of triplicates; dNA, not available.