TABLE 2.
A | ||||||||
Independent | S. maltophilia in | S. maltophilia in | S. Typhimurium in | S. Typhimurium in | ||||
trial number | single-species biofilms | dual-species biofilms | single-species biofilms | dual-species biofilms | ||||
Control | UV treated | Control | UV treated | Control | UV treated | Control | UV treated | |
1 | >8.2a | 3.5 ± 0.2 | >8.2a | <1.7b | >8.2a | <1.7b | >8.2a | <1.7b |
2 | 7.8 ± 1.1 | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 9.0 ± 0.3 | <1.7b | 7.9 ± 0.1 | <1.7b | 8.1 ± 0.1 | <1.7b |
3 | 9.0 ± 0.2 | <1.7b | 9.6 ± 0.2 | <1.7b | 9.2 ± 0.1 | <1.7b | 9.0 ± 0.1 | <1.7b |
B | ||||||||
Independent | S. maltophilia in | S. maltophilia in | P. fluorescens in | P. fluorescens in | ||||
trial number | single-species biofilms | dual-species biofilms | single-species biofilms | dual-species biofilms | ||||
Control | UV treated | Control | UV treated | Control | UV treated | Control | UV treated | |
1 | 8.4 ± 0.0 | 2.0c | 8.4 ± 0.0 | 2.0c | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 1.7c | 8.3 ± 0.3 | <1.7b |
2 | 8.0 ± 0.2 | 1.7c | 7.9 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 8.1 ± 0.1 | 1.7c | 8.3 ± 0.1 | 3.0 ± 1.1d |
3 | 8.6 ± 0.0 | <1.7b | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 8.2 ± 0.1 | <1.7b | 8.3 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.7 |
Each data point represents the average of triplicates. aAll plates were too many to count, >300 colonies per plate (TNTC), corresponding to >8.2 log CFU/well; bbelow detection limit, <1 colony per plate, corresponding to <1.7 log CFU/well; cdata from one of the triplicates, the other two replicates were below the detection limit; ddata from the average of two out of the triplicates, the other replicate was below the detection limit.