Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 29;13:262. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00262

Table 2.

Brief summary of preclinical behavioral models most currently used to study the neurobiology of addiction: motivation and seeking in contingent models, models including alternative rewards.

Model Advantages Limits
Contingent—motivation for drug taking
Progressive Ratio (PR)
  • Simple task

  • Can be done several times throughout training

  • Direct comparisons between different reinforcers not possible

  • Reward on-board during test

Behavioral Economics
  • Can measure several parameters of motivation within one session

  • Can be done several times throughout training

  • Direct comparisons between different reinforcers possible

  • Complex data analysis

DSM Related
  • Modeled directly from DSM criteria

  • Good face validity

  • Requires the use of several different behavioral paradigms

  • Long protocol

Contingent—drug seeking and relapse
Cued-Reinstatement
  • Two types: discrete and discriminative cues

  • Simple set-up

  • Good face validity

  • Action precedes the reward-cue in discrete cue-induced reinstatement (usually reverse in human population)

Context-Reinstatement
  • Can assess the effects of a compilation of cues on different sensory modalities on drug-seeking behavior

  • Complex SA procedures (i.e. multiple contexts needed)

Prime-Reinstatement
  • Simple set-up

  • Good face validity

  • Route of administration normally different than during SA\item

  • Reward on-board during test

Stress-Reinstatement
  • Environmental and interoceptive stressors can be used

  • Shown to increase relapse across several classes of drugs

  • Complex training with certain stressors

  • Difficult to model complex human psychological stressors

Contingent drug seeking in presence of alternative rewards
Any model presenting competing choice between drugs and other rewards
  • Good face validity: models closer to human experience (not-limited to drug exposure exclusively)

  • Myriad of alternative rewards available (appetitive foods, social interactions, enriched environment, etc.)

  • Complex study of the neurobiology of each reward

  • Might require longer training and protocols

  • Might require larger n and additional controls