TABLE 3.
Final MG-LGCM for social support protective factor by teen dating violence (TDV) perpetration typea
| Verbal TDV | Relational TDV | Physical/Threatening TDV | Sexual TDV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth parameters | ||||
| Intercept | ||||
| Intercept | 12.6 (0.13)* | 12.6 (0.10)* | 12.6 (0.10)* | 12.5 (0.10)* |
| TDV typeb | 0.02 (0.14) | −0.44 (0.22)* | −0.15 (0.16) | 0.07 (0.19) |
| Biological Sex | 0.55 (0.018)* | 0.32 (0.10)* | 0.54 (0.11)* | 0.30 (0.10)* |
| Interaction | −0.39 (0.21) | −0.52 (0.29) | −0.64 (0.21)* | −0.57 (0.28)* |
| Slope | ||||
| Slope | 0.08 (0.05) | 0.07 (0.04) | 0.09 (0.04)* | 0.11 (0.04)* |
| TDV typeb | −0.02 (0.04) | −0.07 (0.06) | −0.13 (0.04)* | −0.41 (0.05)* |
| Biological Sex | −0.05 (0.05) | 0.03 (0.03) | −0.02 (0.03) | 0.02 (0.03) |
| Interaction | 0.14 (0.06)* | 0.24 (0.08)* | 0.25 (0.06)* | 0.21 (0.08)* |
| Variance | ||||
| Intercept | 2.32 (0.12)* | 2.27 (0.12)* | 2.62 (0.12)* | 2.34 (0.12)* |
| Slope | 0.03 (0.10)* | 0.03 (0.01)* | 0.09 (0.04)* | 0.02 (0.01)* |
| Co-variance | ||||
| Intercept with Slope | −0.034 (0.098) | 0.076 (0.095) | −0.104 (0.061) | −0.09 (0.15) |
| Model fit | ||||
| –2LL | 40,786.5 | 40,761.0 | 40,744.6 | 40,696.1 |
| AIC | 40,832.5 | 40,807.0 | 40,790.4 | 40,742.1 |
| BIC | 40,954.8 | 40,929.4 | 40,913.0 | 40,864.5 |
| CFI | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| RMSEA | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
Notes. MG-LGCM = multi-group latent growth models.
a
Self-reported age, race/ethnicity, and maternal education, history of trauma, family conflict, bullying perpetration, and impulsivity were controlled for during analyses.
b
TDV type refers to type of TDV in each column. That is, the type of TDV in each interaction is represented by the column of TDV type.
*
p < .05.