C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is a complement-mediated rare disease characterized by predominant glomerular C3 fragment deposition along with electron-dense deposits on electron microscopy.S1 Definitive diagnosis may be made by the microscopic evaluation of kidney biopsy samples; however, the causes that evoke complement dysregulation in individual cases have not yet been established.
The CFH gene encodes a key regulator of the complement pathway, the complement factor H (CFH). CFH and CFHR genes (CFHR1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), located adjacent to CFH, comprise the CFH/CFHR gene cluster on chromosome 1q32. These genes have high sequence homology, which makes the cluster capable of undergoing recombination events.
Six patterns of hybrid genes in the CFH/CFHR gene cluster were identified over the past few years; these included internal duplication of CFHR1,1 CFHR5,2,3 CFHR3-CFHR1 hybrid,4 CFHR2-CFHR5 hybrid,5 CFHR5-CFHR2 hybrid,6 and CFHR1-CFHR5 hybrid.7
A 15-year-old girl (III-1, Figure 1a) presented with a history of recurrent macroscopic hematuria. A kidney biopsy revealed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (Figure 1b) with prominent C3 staining over the mesangial area (Figure 1c), but no relevant Ig staining. Electron microcopy showed subendothelial and intramembranous electron-dense deposits (Figure 1d and e). The patient’s father (II-1) and her paternal aunt (II-3) had a history of proteinuria (Figure 1a). In both cases, light microscopy revealed membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with prominent C3 staining (Figure 1f and g). They developed end-stage kidney disease and underwent hemodialysis.
Figure 1.
Familial C3 glomerulopathy with the CFHR2-CFHR1 genetic hybrid. (a) Family tree. Affected members are shown with solid symbols. The patient’s paternal grandmother (I-2) was diagnosed as having proteinuria during pregnancy. Carriers of the CFHR2-CFHR1 hybrid gene and deletion of CFHR3 and CFHR1 (ΔCFHR3/1) are indicated with a red asterisk and blue triangle, respectively. (b) Light microscopy with periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stain shows diffused mesangial matrix expansion and increased mesangial cellularity from the index patient (III-1). (c) Immunofluorescence showing dominant C3 deposition along the capillary loops and mesangium from the index patient (III-1). (d,e) Electron microscopy demonstrates a subendothelial electron-dense deposit from the index patient (III-1). (f,g) Representative light microscopic appearance of a kidney biopsy with PAS stain of II-1 and II-3, respectively, demonstrating diffused mesangial matrix expansion and increased mesangial cellularity. Bars = (b) 50 μm, (d) 2 μm, (e) 1 μm, (f) 50 μm, and (g) 50 μm. (h) Western blotting of plasma under nonreducing conditions with anti-CFHR1 monoclonal antibodies. Abnormal higher-molecular-weight proteins were detected in the index case and the other affected family members. III-1 and II-3 do not have a normal CFHR1 protein. (i) C3G-affected members of the family, II-1, II-3, and III-1, carry heterozygous duplication of CFHR2 intron 1 to exon 3, which the healthy members, II-2 and III-2, do not. Four members in the family inherited the heterozygous deletion of CFHR3 and CFHR1 (ΔCFHR3/1). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe analysis for CFHR4 was performed with in-house probes. (j) Schematic representation of the CFHR2-CFHR1 hybrid gene. A 10,458-bp CFHR2 sequence was inserted to the beginning of the CFHR1 gene. The 5ʹ region of insertion (breakpoint A) was in 740-bp homologous sequence, between the sequence around CFHR1 exon 1 and that around CFHR2 exon 1. (k) Breakpoint B was confirmed by long polymerase chain reaction amplification with breakpoint-specific primers. HC, healthy control. (l) Chromatogram showing breakpoint B. (m) Breakpoint A was confirmed by long polymerase chain reaction amplification with breakpoint-specific primers. (n) Representation of the 2 alleles in a CFH/CFHR cluster from the index patient (III-1). (o) Putative structure of the CFHR2-CFHR1 hybrid protein. Blue and red circles denote short consensus repeats, which are domains of these proteins, originated from CFHR2 and CFHR1, respectively.
In the index case (III-1), complement parameters C3, C4, and CH50 were within the normal range. Anti-CFH antibodies were not detected. The hemolytic assay using sheep red blood cellsS2 showed that her plasma did not cause hemolysis.
A screen for pathogenic variants by Sanger sequencing detected no abnormality in CFH, CFI, CFB, C3, and MCP (see Supplementary Methods). Whole-exome sequencing performed to examine the C3G-associated genes, CFH, CFHR1–5, CFI, CFB, C3, and MCP, did not identify any pathogenic variants (see Supplementary Methods).
Western blotting of family members’ plasma (see Supplementary Methods) for CFHR1 showed additional anomalous bands of approximately 40 kDa only in the affected members (II-1, II-3, and III-1) (Figure 1h). Western blot revealed that the CFHR2, 3, 4, and 5 proteins banded at their appropriate molecular weights in the blot (data not shown).
Copy number variation analysis in the CFH/CFHR gene cluster performed using multiplex ligation-dependent probe analysis with commercial and in-house probes (sequences available on request) showed an unusual heterozygous duplication extending from CFHR2 intron 1 to exon 3 only in the affected members (II-1, II-3, and III-1) (Figure 1i) (see Supplementary Methods). In addition, 4 family members (II-2, II-3, III-1, and III-2) had a classic CFHR3 and CFHR1 heterozygous deletion (⊿CFHR3/1), which was reportedly polymorphic.8
Based on the Western blotting and multiplex ligation-dependent probe analysis results, we suspected the existence of a hybrid gene made up of CFHR1 and CFHR2. To identify chromosomal breakpoint, whole-genome analysis was performed using the genomic DNA sample of the patient’s father (II-1) (see Supplementary Methods). The software Breakdancer (version 1.3.6)9,S3 detected a breakpoint between CFHR2 intron 3 and CFHR1 intron 1 (breakpoint B in Figure 1j). A forward primer localized in CFHR2 intron 3 and a reverse primer in CFHR1 intron 1 generated an amplicon consistent with the breakpoint detected by Breakdancer (Figure 1k). Based on the sequencing of the amplicon, we revealed the exact sequence around the breakpoint (Figure 1l).
Furthermore, the other breakpoint (breakpoint A in Figure 1j), which was located on the opposite side of insertion, was characterized using the forward primer specific to the intergenic region between CFHR3 and CFHR1, and the reverse primer specific to CFHR2 intron 1 (Figure 1m). Bidirectional sequencing of the amplicon revealed that the breakpoint was present within a 740-base pair (bp) region, homologous to sequences around CFHR1 exon 1 and CFHR2 exon 1.
Based on the results of Western blotting, showing that the patient and her paternal aunt do not have normal CFHR1 protein, but her father does, the hybrid gene should be on the other allele, where ⊿CFHR3/1 does not exist (Figure 1n).
Overall, these data demonstrate that the disease segregated with a novel CFHR2-CFHR1 hybrid gene resulting from an in-flame insertion of 10,458-bp segment, which spans from CFHR2 exon1 to intron 3, into the 5ʹ side of CFHR1. The 5ʹ side of the insertion sequence was localized to a 740-bp homologous sequence. The aminoterminal duplicated CFHR protein (CFHR21,2-CFHR1 hybrid protein) was predicted to exist (Figure 1o).
The presence of multiple highly homologous sequences makes the CFH/CFHR gene cluster a hot spot for genomic rearrangement.S4 For example, ⊿CFHR3/1 is not rare in the general population (minor allele frequency 0.0–0.547, depending on the ethnicityS5). Most hybrid genes in the CFH/CFHR gene cluster are speculated to be the result of nonallelic homologous recombination; however, unlike ⊿CFHR3/1, the pathogenic hybrids in the CFH/CFHR gene cluster were observed only in patients with C3G1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.S6–S11 For the patients with C3G, the international conference recommended performing suitable methods to detect copy number variation or hybrid genes.8 Our case also emphasizes the significance to perform such analyses.
In the present case, the 2 breakpoints displayed different characteristics. Breakpoint A occurred in the 740-bp homologous sequences, which indicates the occurrence of nonallelic homologous recombination. However, breakpoint B indicates the occurrence of nonhomologous end joining, due to the absence of homology. Moreover, the Breakdancer software could not detect the breakpoint A, whereas it could detect breakpoint B. Because Breakdancer provides a genome-wide detection of structural variations using the information from “discordant read pairs,”9,S3,S12 it cannot detect the recombination between homologous sequences longer than the paired-end read (350 bp for HiSeq X).
The present CFHR2-CFHR1 hybrid protein and the C3G-associated hybrid proteins described in previous reports1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 share common characteristics, such as duplication of the N-terminal domain. Duplicated N-terminal domain may reportedly cause multimerization of the hybrid proteins, which increases their competition with CFH and causes dysregulation of the complement pathway.S13
To date, the standard treatment for C3G has not been established. Detailed genetic analysis is recommended to elucidate the pathophysiology of C3G and develop new treatment options.
To conclude, we have described a familial case of C3G with a novel CFHR2-CFHR1 hybrid gene. This is the first case of C3G-associated hybrid gene detection using whole-genome sequencing. As the hybrid gene originated from recombination between introns, it could not be detected by whole-exome sequencing or Sanger sequencing of the exons. Detailed examination of the CFH/CFHR gene cluster, such as structural variation analysis or copy number analysis, is required to determine the cause of familial cases of C3G with previously unknown etiology.
Disclosure
MN has received honoraria and subsidies from Alexion Pharma. All the other authors declared no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Yoshiko Tanaka for help and contribution to the care of patients. We also thank Dr. Jun Mitsui for technical assistance on the experiment, especially multiplex ligation-dependent probe analysis.
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (15K09246, HK), the Japanese Association for Complement Research (HK), and the Practical Research Project for Rare/Intractable Diseases from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED (17ek0109254h0001, YS, HK, YY, TM, and MN).
Author Contributions
YS analyzed the whole data, and wrote the initial draft the manuscript; HK conceived the study and contributed to analysis and interpretation of data; YY and MF analyzed the data and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript; KK and TM analyzed the data in the part of Sanger sequencing; YA and KM collected the patient’s and her family’s clinical information; and MH and MN contributed to interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript, and are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Footnotes
Supplementary Material
References
- 1.Tortajada A., Yebenes H., Abarrategui-Garrido C. C3 glomerulopathy-associated CFHR1 mutation alters FHR oligomerization and complement regulation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2434–2446. doi: 10.1172/JCI68280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gale D.P., de Jorge E.G., Cook H.T. Identification of a mutation in complement factor H-related protein 5 in patients of Cypriot origin with glomerulonephritis. Lancet. 2010;376:794–801. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60670-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Medjeral-Thomas N., Malik T.H., Patel M.P. A novel CFHR5 fusion protein causes C3 glomerulopathy in a family without Cypriot ancestry. Kidney Int. 2014;85:933–937. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Malik T.H., Lavin P.J., Goicoechea de Jorge E. A hybrid CFHR3–1 gene causes familial C3 glomerulopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1155–1160. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012020166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen Q., Wiesener M., Eberhardt H.U. Complement factor H-related hybrid protein deregulates complement in dense deposit disease. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:145–155. doi: 10.1172/JCI71866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xiao X., Ghossein C., Tortajada A. Familial C3 glomerulonephritis caused by a novel CFHR5-CFHR2 fusion gene. Mol Immunol. 2016;77:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2016.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Togarsimalemath S.K., Sethi S.K., Duggal R. A novel CFHR1-CFHR5 hybrid leads to a familial dominant C3 glomerulopathy. Kidney Int. 2017;92:876–887. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goodship T.H., Cook H.T., Fakhouri F. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2017;91:539–551. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fan X., Abbott T.E., Larson D. BreakDancer: identification of genomic structural variation from paired-end read mapping. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2014;45 doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1506s45. 15.16.1–15.16.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

