Fuller 2016.
Methods | Design: cluster‐RT Groups: intervention (Modified Brief Behavioural Intervention Insomnia (MBBTi)); control (usual care + information leaflet) |
|
Participants | Pharmacies: 12 (7 intervention; 5 control) Pharmacy workers: not reported ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Pharmacy user: 56 insomniacs (22 intervention; 34 control)
Setting: unclear Country: New South Wales, Australia |
|
Interventions |
Pharmacy worker‐directed intervention: training on sleep and sleep management through interactive lectures, case study discussions, role play plus manual with details of sleep and MBBTi
Pharmacy worker control: control group manual provided detailed background information on sleep and sleep health, insomnia and its impact, models of insomnia and general insomnia treatment (pharmacological and sleep hygiene methods). ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Pharmacy user‐directed intervention: standardised education + sleep restriction and/or stimulus control, goal setting, sleep diaries
Pharmacy user control: usual care and information sheets on insomnia if needed |
|
Outcomes |
Pharmacy worker:
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Pharmacy user:
|
|
Notes | Funding source: Scholarship Faculty Pharmacy, University of Sydney and CIRUS (Centre for Integrated Research into the Understanding of Sleep) | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Used RAND function in Excel for simple randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Incomplete allocation concealment |
Baseline outcome measures similar | Low risk | MBBTi and control patients were similar at baseline |
Baseline characteristics similar | Low risk | No significant differences between groups in any of the demographics |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Alternative analysis performed to allow for all available data to be used |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Pharmacists undertook data collection, but did not score key outcomes at follow‐up. |
Protection against contamination | Low risk | Cluster randomised |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Not apparent |
Other bias | High risk | Cluster effects not taken into account for all key outcomes other than the ISI. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Pharmacists were aware of participants' groups. |