Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 5;6(2):2055102919891396. doi: 10.1177/2055102919891396

Table 1.

Summary of the literature on the use of avoidant-type coping measures among people with CID.

Variable Coping scale
WCC/WCQ COPE Brief COPE CRI Total number
Type of CID
 Amputation 1 1 2 0 4 (4.1%)
 Cancer 10 13 4 6 33 (33.7%)
 Cardio 4 5 12 1 22 (22.4%)
 MS 12 4 1 0 17 (17.3%)
 SCI 6 4 3 0 13 (13.3%)
 TBI 2 4 1 2 9 (9.2%)
Duration of CID
 0–2 months 2 3 0 0 5 (5.1%)
 >2 months–2 years 6 6 3 3 18 (18.4%)
 >2–10 years 9 4 7 2 22 (22.4%
 >10 years 5 3 2 0 10 (10.2%)
 Not reported 13 15 11 4 43 (43.9%)
Scale version
 Original 20 23 15 6 64 (65.3%)
 Modified/partial 15 8 8 3 34 (34.7%)
Research Design
 Cross sectional 26 19 21 7 73 (74.5%)
 Longitudinala 9 12 2 2 25 (25.5%)
Type of outcome used
 Positive 5 7 5 0 17 (17.3%)
 Negative 22 15 6 6 49 (50%)
 Mixedb 6 7 10 3 26 (26.5%)
 Otherc 4 0 2 0 6 (6.1%)
Direction of association
 ATC correlated with poor adaptation 28 22 21 8 79 (80.6%)
 ATC uncorrelated with poor adaptation 7 9 2 1 19 (19.4%)
Magnitude of association between ATC and outcomesd
r < .10 9 10 6 2 27 (10.1%)
 .11 < r < .30 16 41 21 1 79 (29.5%)
 .31 < r < .50 23 34 35 4 96 (35.8%)
r > .51 8 10 6 1 25 (9.3%)
β significant 11 9 1 5 26 (9.7%)
β nonsignificant 5 1 1 1 8 (3%)
ATC scale’s alpha coefficient valuee
α ⩽ .50 1 0 2 3 6 (5.3%)
 .50 < α ⩽ .70 10 11 6 3 30 (26.5%)
α > .70 10 8 11 0 29 (25.7%)
α unspecified, unreported, or includes multiple values 20 17 8 3 48 (42.5%)

WCC: Ways of Coping Checklist; WCQ: Ways of Coping Questionnaire; COPE: Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced; CRI: Coping Responses Inventory; CID: chronic illness and disability; MS: multiple sclerosis; SCI: spinal cord injuries; TBI: traumatic brain injuries; ATC: avoidance-type coping.

a

Of these: T1–T2 (n = 14), T1–T3 (n = 7), T1–T4 (n = 3), and T1–T9 (n = 1).

b

Includes both negatively and positively valanced outcome measures.

c

Includes non-traditional, trait-like outcomes such as hope, optimism, self-efficacy, as well as seldom used measures (see “Discussion”).

d

Many of the studies reported correlations between different ATC scales/measures and several outcomes, yielding a total of 268 coefficient values. Also, several studies reported only β values and their level of significance. Finally seven studies failed to report any qualitative data (see “Results”).

e

Several of the studies reported more than one ATC measure, yielding a total of 113 coefficient values.