Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;9(11):303. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9110303

Table 5.

RT qPCR gene expression represented as average fold change evaluating the effect of stimulation in cell cultures without glutamate (ES_No-Glu).

Biological Process Gene ES_No-Glu vs. No-ES_No-Glu
Monophasic Cathodic AsymBi 1:0.5 SymBi 1:1 Cathodic PR Anodic PR AsymBi 1:2 Monophasic Anodic
Immune Function Gfap 0.821 0.745 0.802 1.469 1.653 0.488 * 0.700
Synaptic Transmission Slc7a11 0.914 0.690 0.596 1.204 1.924 0.843 0.921
Glul 0.659 1.469 1.068 1.111 1.108 0.724 0.580
Neuroprotection S100a4 0.632 1.072 0.923 1.162 1.468 0.617 0.449 *
Redox Processes Mt2a 0.521 1.310 1.392 2.445 2.875 * 0.722 0.444
Gsr 0.875 0.654 1.134 1.179 1.106 0.807 0.980
Hmox1 1.342 0.679 0.625 0.712 1.136 0.701 2.029
Cell Adaptive Response Bag3 0.948 0.939 0.880 1.102 1.484 1.154 1.057

Anodic content in the waveform increases from left to right. p < 0.05 was considered significant. *, represents significance vs no-stimulation no-glutamate (No-ES_No-Glu); denotes 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10.