Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 31;9(11):303. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9110303

Table 6.

RT qPCR gene expression represented as average fold change evaluating effect of stimulation with glutamate (ES_Glu) relative to cells not exposed to ES and additional glutamate (No-ES_No-Glu).

Biological Process Gene ES_Glu vs. No-ES_No-Glu
Monophasic Cathodic AsymBi 1:0.5 SymBi 1:1 Cathodic PR Anodic PR AsymBi 1:2 Monophasic Anodic
Immune Function Gfap 1.085 2.442 * 1.061 4.184 * 1.864 0.513 0.698
Synaptic Transmission Slc7a11 6.502 * 3.170 * 2.653 * 7.083 * 5.443 * 2.592 * 4.545 *
Glul 1.015 0.991 0.848 1.352 1.600 1.034 0.846
Neuroprotection S100a4 0.563 0.975 0.883 0.935 1.118 0.798 0.883
Redox Processes Mt2a 2.129 2.855 * 2.095 4.627 * 2.983 * 0.845 1.643
Gsr 0.886 1.017 1.058 0.807 1.377 0.724 1.065
Hmox1 2.830 * 0.798 2.923 * 1.750 3.804 * 2.246 * 3.574 *
Cell Adaptive Response Bag3 0.897 0.781 1.057 1.325 0.986 0.862 1.437

Anodic content in the waveform increases from left to right. p < 0.05 was considered significant. * represents significance vs. no-stimulation no-glutamate (No-ES No-Glu) denotes 0.05 ≤ p < 0.075.