Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2019 Dec 5;20:586. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2979-0

Table 4.

Accuracy of each anteversion measurement method compared to reference anteversion using Pearson’s correlation

		Correlation coefficient	p value
Reference
Pradhan et al. [13]	Pelvis AP	0.958	< 0.001
Pradhan et al. [13]	Hip-centered AP	0.973	< 0.001
Lewinnek et al. [1]	Pelvis AP	0.962	< 0.001
Lewinnek et al. [1]	Hip-centered AP	0.968	< 0.001
Widmer et al. [14]	Pelvis AP	0.851	< 0.001
Widmer et al. [14]	Hip-centered AP	0.791	< 0.001
Liaw et al. [15]	Pelvis AP	0.964	< 0.001
Liaw et al. [15]	Hip-centered AP	0.969	< 0.001
Hassan et al. [16]	Pelvis AP	0.575	< 0.001
Hassan et al. [16]	Hip-centered AP	0.610	< 0.001
Ackland et al. [17]	Pelvis AP	0.774	< 0.001
Ackland et al. [17]	Hip-centered AP	0.779	< 0.001

AP anteroposterior