Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 28;8(Suppl 1):S50–S56. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_52_19

Table 3.

Bridge technique in 25 patients

Author, year of publication n Access Gauge of the needle Wire (inch) Use of a 6-Fr cystotome Dilation Type of stent Type of stenosis Previous stent placement Clinical success Adverse events Survival/follow-up
Ogura et al., 2015[15] 7 Stomach 19 0.025 No Yes, 7-Fr tapered ERCP catheter, 4-mm balloon catheter (2 patients) 6 cm uncovered metal stent, fully covered stent Obstructed right IHBD No 100% No 116 days
Moryoussef et al., 2017[18] 3 (6 attempts) Stomach 19 0.035 Yes for HGS, no for bridge technique Yes, hilar stenosis with a balloon No, hepatic fistula 8 cm metal covered, uncovered metal stent Bismuth, 2 Unknown 50% No Unknown
Caillol et al., 2019[19] 12 Stomach 19 0.035 Yes Yes, hilar stenosis with a 4-mm balloon 6 cm or 8 cm metal uncovered, partially metal covered stent Type II, 9 Type IIIB, 2 Type IV, 1 No 83% (10/12) Yes, morbidity rate: 33% (4 patients) with 1 patient needing re-endoscopy; mortality rate: 8% (1 patient) 6 months

Fr: French, HGS: Hepaticogastrostomy, IHBD: Intrahepatic bile duct