Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2019 Mar 1;33(7):780–802. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1581916

Table 4.

Summary of the mixed-effects logistic regression models for Experiment 1, priming effects on off-line target responses

Predictors Estimate Std. error χ2 p-Value
Priming effects: HOA
(Intercept) −0.091 0.280
Prime (HA vs. LA) 0.299 0.281 4.930 < .05
Verb (same vs. different) −0.521 0.330 1.251 0.263
Expt Order 0.269 0.434 0.406 0.523
Prime x Verb 0.442 0.432 0.602 0.437
Prime x Expt Order 0.007 0.300 0.333 0.563
Verb x Expt Order 0.271 0.308 0.305 0.580
Prime x Verb x Expt Order −0.290 0.417 0.486 0.485
 
Priming effects: PWA
(Intercept) −0.062 0.282
Prime (HA vs. LA) 0.444 0.243 7.727 < .01
Verb (same vs. different) 0.008 0.308 1.96 0.161
Expt Order −0.694 0.484 4.870 < .05
Prime x Verb 0.207 0.358 0.099 0.751
Prime x Expt Order −0.019 0.399 0.230 0.631
Verb x Expt Order 0.421 0.403 0.838 0.359
Prime x Verb x Expt Order −0.271 0.500 0.294 0.587
 
Priming effects: HOA and PWA
(Intercept) −0.337 0.245
Prime (HA vs. LA) 0.515 0.208 10.714 < .001
Verb (same vs. different) 0.175 0.239 0.270 0.603
Group (HOA vs. PWA) 0.400 0.361 0.010 0.919
Prime x Verb 0.020 0.311 0.738 0.390
Prime x Group −0.387 0.288 0.691 0.405
Verb x Group −0.557 0.315 1.958 0.161
Prime x Verb x Group 0.432 0.400 1.170 0.279

Reference levels are as follows: Prime, LA; Verb, different; Group, HOA; Expt Order, Expt 1 first. Superscripts indicate random slopes that were included in the final model; P, participant; I, Item. Random intercepts were included on both participants and items in all models.