Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2019 Mar 1;33(7):780–802. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1581916

Table 6.

Summary of mixed-effects linear regression models for Experiment 1, priming effects on target response times.

Predictors Estimate Std. error χ2 p-Value
Priming effects: HOA P,I
(Intercept) 62.97 2.587
Prime (primed vs. unprimed) −0.852 2.430 5.07 < .05
Verb (same vs. different) −0.155 0.386 0.149 0.699
Expt Order −3.655 1.419 2.014 0.155
Prime x Verb 0.219 −0.641 0.410 0.521
Prime x Expt Order −0.544 1.856 3.443 0.064
Verb x Expt Order −0.380 1.206 1.453 0.227
Prime x Verb x Expt Order 0.312 −1.106 1.222 0.268
Priming effects: PWAP,I
(Intercept) 75.83 4.109
Prime (primed vs. unprimed) −1.144 0.523 4.780 < .05
Verb (same vs. different) −0.551 0.535 1.062 0.302
Expt Order −2.960 4.107 0.519 0.471
Prime x Verb 0.698 0.465 2.245 0.134
Prime x Expt Order −0.282 0.520 0.293 0.587
Verb x Expt Order −0.182 0.514 0.125 0.723
Prime x Verb x Expt Order −0.689 0.462 2.224 0.135
Priming effects: HOA and PWAP
(Intercept) 69.71 2.171
Prime (primed vs. unprimed) −1.041 0.283 13.54 < .001
Verb (same vs. different) −0.399 0.345 1.334 0.247
Group (HOA vs. PWA) 6.781 2.161 9.840 <.01
Prime x Verb 0.341 0.257 1.760 0.184
Prime x Group 0.168 0.282 0.355 0.550
Verb x Group 0.181 0.279 0.421 0.516
Prime x Verb x Group −0.222 0.256 0.753 0.385

Note: Reference levels are as follows: Prime, unprimed target responses; Verb, different; Group, HOA; Expt Order, Expt 1 first. Superscripts indicate random slopes that were included in the final model;

P

participant

I

Item.

Random intercepts were included on both participants and items in all models.