Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aphasiology. 2019 Mar 1;33(7):780–802. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1581916

Table 7.

Summary of mixed-effects logistic regression models for Experiment 2, priming effects on off-line target responses

Predictors Estimate Std. error χ2 p-Value
Priming effects: HOAP,I
(Intercept) 0.090 0.267
Prime (HA vs. LA) 0.206 0.243 10.934 < .001
Verb (same vs. different) −0.276 0.278 0.002 0.884
Expt Order −0.031 0.506 0.505 0.423
Prime x Verb 0.269 0.352 0.590 0.437
Prime x Expt Order 0.449 0.309 3.115 0.078
Verb x Expt Order 0.325 0.321 1.490 0.222
Prime x Verb x Expt Order −0.094 0.437 0.047 0.828
Priming effects: PWAP,I
(Intercept) 0.031 0.201
Prime (HA vs. LA) 0.429 0.213 20.650 < .001
Verb (same vs. different) −0.300 0.215 0.909 0.340
Expt Order −0.358 0.291 0.394 0.528
Prime x Verb 0.311 0.298 1.132 0.287
Prime x Expt Order −0.041 0.316 0.287 0.592
Verb x Expt Order 0.632 0.319 5.799 <.05
Prime x Verb x Expt Order −0.168 0.440 0.147 0.701
Priming effects: HOA and PWAP,I
(Intercept) −0.110 0.147
Prime (HA vs. LA) 0.401 0.169 24.38 < .001
Verb (same vs. different) −0.077 0.189 0.589 0.442
Group (HOA vs. PWA) 0.218 0.296 0.494 0.481
Prime x Verb 0.293 0.246 1.660 0.197
Prime x Group −0.016 0.230 0.087 0.767
Verb x Group −0.045 0.243 0.214 0.643
Prime x Verb x Group −0.068 0.327 0.043 0.835

Reference levels are as follows: Prime, LA; Verb, different; Group, HOA; Expt Order, Expt 1 first. Superscripts indicate random slopes that were included in the final model

P

participant

I

Item.

Random intercepts were included on both participants and items in all models.