Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Life Sci. 2019 Oct 23;239:116885. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116885

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Echocardiographic parameters comparing cardiac functional changes among FA (Sed: n=5; Ex: n=3) or PM2.5 (Sed: n=5; Ex: n=4) exposed sedentary and exercise mouse groups. A. Fractional shortening (%FS), B. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), C. Left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESd), D. Posterior wall thickness during diastole (PWTd), E. Posterior wall thickness during systole (PWTs). Five beat cycles were captured and three loops averaged per assessment. Data are expressed as ± S.E.M. *p ≤0.05 vs FA sedentary, #p<0.05 vs PM2.5 sedentary,$ $p<0.01 vs FA exercise.