. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Sep 25;32(12):1565–1573. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.07.018

Table 2.

Logistic regression models for strain parameters and LV recovery

	OR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	P	OR (95% CI)	P
	Univariate		Adjustment for HR		Adjustment for age
GLS	1.97 (1.42–2.74)	<.001	1.97 (1.42–2.74)	<.001	1.99 (1.43–2.77)	<.001
GCS	1.44 (1.20–1.73)	<.001	1.44 (1.20–1.75)	<.001	1.44 (1.20–1.74)	<.001
	Adjustment for black race		Adjustment for NYHA functional class III/IV		Adjustment for LVEF
GLS	1.95 (1.41–2.7)	<.001	1.91 (1.36–2.67)	<.001	2.07 (1.4–3.05)	<.001
GCS	1.46 (1.20–1.77)	<.001	1.4 (1.15–1.69)	<.001	1.37 (1.1–1.71)	.005
	Adjustment for LVDd ≥ 6.0 cm
GLS	1.81 (1.29–2.53)	<.001
GCS	1.42 (1.16–1.74)	<.001

HR, heart rate; LVDd, LV end-diastolic diameter; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OR, odds ratio.