Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2019 Dec 2;26(12):1176–1183. doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0343-6

TABLE 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Vif176Δ114–157–A3FCTDm-40-CBFβ151 (EMD-9380, PDB 6NIL) Vif176–A3FCTDm-40-CBFβ187 (EMD-9381)
Data collection and processing 1 2/3 1
Magnification 130,000 130,000
Voltage (kV) 300 300
Electron exposure (e2) ~56 61/56 59
Defocus range (μm) −1.2 to −2.9 −1.7 to −3.7/ −1.5 to −3.2 −0.9 to −2.9
Pixel size (Å) 1.05 1.05
Stage tilting (°) 0 −30/−30 −30
Symmetry imposed D2 D2
Initial particle images (no.) 1243243 (untilt) / 1197365 (tilt) 1140691
Final particle images (no.) 337256 165629
Map resolution (Å) 3.9 5
FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3.7–4.6 -
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB code) 4N9F, 3WUS -
Model resolution (Å) 3.9 -
FSC threshold 0.5
Model resolution range (Å) 3.9–113.4 -
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −223 −359
Model composition
 Nonhydrogen atoms 15216 -
 Protein residues 1800 -
 Ligands Zn, 4 -
B factors (Å2)
 Protein 113 -
 Ligand 343 -
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.005 -
 Bond angles (°) 1.0 -
Validation
MolProbity score 1.67 -
Clashscore 3 -
Poor rotamers (%) 0.99 -
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 90.4 -
 Allowed (%) 9.6 -
 Disallowed (%) 0 -