Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct 17;141:192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.028

Table 1.

Numerical comparison of using DAUnet and DSUnet on sMRI data.

Method DSC Sensitivity Specificity HD (mm) MSD (mm) RMSD (mm) CMD (mm) PVD
Bladder DSUnet 0.93±0.05 0.96±0.04 0.90±0.07 12.68±14.93 0.67±0.28 1.11±0.56 1.28±1.08 4.8%±7.9%
DAUnet 0.95±0.03 0.95±0.04 0.94±0.04 6.81±9.25 0.52±0.22 0.89±0.59 0.95±0.63 4.0%±4.1%
p-value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.004 <0.001 0.124
Prostate DSUnet 0.82±0.05 0.83±0.09 0.83±0.09 7.79±4.32 1.21±0.63 1.72±1.05 2.81±1.57 16.0%±15.0%
DAUnet 0.87±0.04 0.86±0.08 0.88±0.08 6.35±3.11 0.93±0.51 1.38±0.85 1.90±1.32 14.7%±14.9%
p-value <0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.116
Rectum DSUnet 0.88±0.04 0.89±0.05 0.88±0.07 13.16±17.16 1.00±1.06 1.78±2.40 3.51±3.27 7.9%±6.9%
DAUnet 0.89±0.04 0.90±0.05 0.89±0.06 10.84±15.59 0.92±1.03 1.39±1.04 2.81±2.52 7.3%±7.2%
p-value <0.001 <0.001 0.069 0.091 0.003 0.004 <0.001 0.129