Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiother Oncol. 2019 Oct 17;141:192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.028

Table 2.

Numerical comparison by using DAUnet on CT and sMRI data.

Method DSC Sensitivity Specificity HD (mm) MSD (mm) RMSD (mm) CMD (mm) PVD
Bladder CT 0.93±0.03 0.95±0.03 0.95±0.04 10.29±10.56 0.55±0.32 0.97±0.71 1.23±0.82 7.7%±8.9%
sMRI 0.95±0.03 0.95±0.04 0.94±0.04 6.81±9.25 0.52±0.22 0.89±0.59 0.95±0.63 4.0%±4.1%
p-value 0.148 0.092 0.711 0.543 0.166 0.178 0.654 <0.001
Prostate CT 0.82±0.09 0.83±0.07 0.86±0.08 8.52±1.09 1.15±0.66 1.60±1.14 2.27±1.37 18.1%±20.9%
sMRI 0.87±0.04 0.86±0.08 0.88±0.08 6.35±3.11 0.93±0.51 1.38±0.85 1.90±1.32 14.7%±14.9%
p-value <0.001 <0.001 0.299 <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.003 0.001
Rectum CT 0.87±0.05 0.86±0.05 0.88±0.08 16.08±19.63 1.26±1.18 2.42±3.20 3.45±3.32 9.4%±8.0%
sMRI 0.89±0.04 0.90±0.05 0.89±0.06 10.84±15.59 0.92±1.03 1.39±1.04 2.81±2.52 7.3%±7.2%
p-value <0.001 <0.001 0.011 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001