Table 2.
Numerical comparison by using DAUnet on CT and sMRI data.
| Method | DSC | Sensitivity | Specificity | HD (mm) | MSD (mm) | RMSD (mm) | CMD (mm) | PVD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder | CT | 0.93±0.03 | 0.95±0.03 | 0.95±0.04 | 10.29±10.56 | 0.55±0.32 | 0.97±0.71 | 1.23±0.82 | 7.7%±8.9% |
| sMRI | 0.95±0.03 | 0.95±0.04 | 0.94±0.04 | 6.81±9.25 | 0.52±0.22 | 0.89±0.59 | 0.95±0.63 | 4.0%±4.1% | |
| p-value | 0.148 | 0.092 | 0.711 | 0.543 | 0.166 | 0.178 | 0.654 | <0.001 | |
| Prostate | CT | 0.82±0.09 | 0.83±0.07 | 0.86±0.08 | 8.52±1.09 | 1.15±0.66 | 1.60±1.14 | 2.27±1.37 | 18.1%±20.9% |
| sMRI | 0.87±0.04 | 0.86±0.08 | 0.88±0.08 | 6.35±3.11 | 0.93±0.51 | 1.38±0.85 | 1.90±1.32 | 14.7%±14.9% | |
| p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.299 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.001 | |
| Rectum | CT | 0.87±0.05 | 0.86±0.05 | 0.88±0.08 | 16.08±19.63 | 1.26±1.18 | 2.42±3.20 | 3.45±3.32 | 9.4%±8.0% |
| sMRI | 0.89±0.04 | 0.90±0.05 | 0.89±0.06 | 10.84±15.59 | 0.92±1.03 | 1.39±1.04 | 2.81±2.52 | 7.3%±7.2% | |
| p-value | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.011 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |