Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 26;2019:4386401. doi: 10.1155/2019/4386401

Table 2.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Study Country Sample size Diet composition (protein : fat : CHO) (%) Relevant outcomes Mean age (years) Mean BMI (baseline) Duration
Trial group Control group Trial group Control group Trial group Control group Trial group Control group
Yuan et al. [10] China 101 50 40–45 : 30–35 : 20–25 25–30 : 30 : 45 BMI 28.6 ± 1.7 28.5 ± 9.5 27.7 ± 1.7 27.6 ± 1.8 8 weeks
Mehrabani et al. [14] Australia 23 26 30 : 30 : 40 15 : 30 : 55 T, FSH, LH, SHBG, HOMA-IR, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C 30.5 ± 6.4 28.5 ± 5.2 31.9 ± 4.0 31.1 ± 4.6 12 weeks
Gower et al. [12] USA 15 12 19 : 40 : 41 18 : 27 : 55 T, FSH, LH, HOMA-IR, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C 31.2 ± 5.8 31.8 ± 5.7 8 weeks
Moran et al. [13] USA 14 14 30 : 30 : 40 15 : 30 : 55 HOMA-IR, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C 32 ± 1.2 33 ± 1.2 37.9 ± 1.6 37.7 ± 1.9 16 weeks
Wong et al. [11] USA 7 9 20 : 35 : 45 20 : 25 : 55 BMI, T, SHBG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C 15.4 ± 1.3 16.3 ± 2.2 36.2 ± 5.3 33.9 ± 4.7 24 weeks
Perelman et al. [15] USA 6 6 15 : 45 : 40 15 : 25 : 60 TC, HDL-C, LDL-C 30 ± 7 39 ± 7 3 weeks
Douglas et al. [16] USA 9 9 15 : 45 : 43 16 : 31–33 : 55–56 T, FSH, LH, SHBG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C 33 ± 6 30.0 ± 3.7 1 weeks
Stamets et al. [17] USA 13 13 30 : 30 : 40 15 : 30 : 55 T, FSH, LH, HOMA-IR, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C 29 ± 4 26 ± 4 38 ± 4 37 ± 5 4 weeks