Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;40(3):335–342. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2342

Table 2. Main misrepresentations of the mind-brain problem in leading psychiatry journals.

Topic Misrepresentation More balanced/accurate view
Description of Cartesian dualism Mind and brain as compartmentalized, noninteracting parts of human beings Descartes proposed an interactionist dualism, with profound, constant, and mutual mind-body influences
Dangers and harms of dualism Major block to neuropsychiatry and a biopsychosocial approach Interactionist dualism does not deny neuropsychiatry and fosters a biopsychosocial approach
Academic reputation of dualism Dualism is a primitive/superstitious view, not intellectually credible. No learned person accepts it Dualism is alive in contemporary mind-brain debates, defended by reputable philosophers and neuroscientists
Mind-brain relationship It has been proved that mind is a product of brain activity (physicalism) The mind-brain relationship is still an open question. Most empirical findings can be accommodated to both physicalist and nonphysicalist views of the mind
Psychiatrists’ views of the MBP Most psychiatrists accept physicalist views of mind There are very few studies on the subject, and the available evidence suggests that a substantial portion of psychiatrists, health professionals, and university students reject physicalist views of mind
Nature of mental disorders Mental disorders are brain disorders/diseases and this view would reduce stigma The nature of mental disorders is a controversial topic. Mental disorders are related to a wide range of biopsychosocial factors. There is consistent evidence that biogenetic explanations of mental disorders are related to more stigma