Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 17;28(12):3077–3091.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.050

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Gut-Derived MAIT Cells Show a Broadly Similar Response Pattern toward Innate and Adaptive Stimuli Compared with Their Blood-Derived Counterparts

Representative plots showing the percentage of cells positive for the indicated effector molecules as a proportion of CD8+ MAIT cells.

(A–C) Proportions of blood-derived (n = 32) CD8+ MAIT cells producing IFN-γ (A), TNF-α (B), or GrB (C) following overnight stimulation with combinations of suboptimal concentrations of IL-12 and IL-18, TL1A, and αCD3/CD28 beads as indicated.

(D–F) Proportions of gut-derived (n = 13) CD8+ MAIT cells producing IFN-γ (D), TNF-α (E), or GrB (F) stimulated in the same way as in (A)–(C).

(G and H) Expression of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and GrB by blood-derived (G, n = 7) or gut-derived (H, n = 6) CD8+ MAIT cells 20 h after coculture with THP1 cells alone or THP1 cells incubated with 25 fixed E. coli bacteria per cell.

Data were acquired from multiple donors as indicated in 3–5 experiments. Error bars represent means ± SEM. Differences among conditions were analyzed by Friedman tests with Dunn’s multiple comparison tests (A–F), two-way ANOVA (G), or Wilcoxon tests (H). p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.001.

See also Figure S3.