TCR-Mediated Activation of MAIT Cells Leads to the Expression of Tissue-Repair-Associated Molecules and Accelerates Wound Healing
(A–C) Gene set enrichment summary plots for stimulated sorted MAIT cell-versus-unstimulated cell-ranked genes. Depicted are the individual plots for TCR-stimulated versus UT in (A), TC-stimulated versus UT in (B), and C versus unstimulated in (C). Non-significant for C versus UT, normalized enrichment score (NES) = 1.63; p < 0.0002 for TCR versus UT, NES = 1.57; and p < 0.0002 for TC versus UT. Data were acquired from three donors in one experiment.
(D) Flow cytometry analysis of the expression of TNF-α, furin, and CCL3 by CD161++/MAIT CD8+ T cells in response to fixed E. coli presented by THP1 cells in the presence or absence of an anti-MR1 (αMR1) blocking antibody at the 72-h time point.
(E) Statistical analysis of the expression of the effector molecules shown in (D).
(F) Caco2 cells were grown to confluency and scratched with a WoundMaker device to perform in vitro wound-healing assays. Cells were supplemented with different supernatants collected from 72-h cocultures of enriched CD8 T cells with E. coli-loaded THP1 cells in the presence or absence of αMR1, as indicated. The open wound areas were quantified as percentages of the initial wound size in the Caco2 cultures. Data points are mean ± SEM and were acquired from five biological replicates in two experiments.
(G) Representative pictures of the closure of the wounds in Caco2 cultures treated as in (F) were assessed with time-lapse imaging over a time course of 36 h. Data were acquired from seven donors in three experiments.
Differences among conditions were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. ns, not significant; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.001. Scale bars, 250 μm.
See also Figure S5 and Table S3.