Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 14;46(12):1205–1216. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13203

Table 1.

Baseline and post‐baseline % bleeding sites in (a) negative‐controlled studies; (b) positive‐controlled studies

Treatment Baseline Total Post‐baseline
Generally healthy (<10%) Gingivitis (≥10%)
(a)
SnF2 <10% 436 430 (99%) 6 (1%)
≥10% 444 301 (68%) 143 (32%)
Neg Control <10% 365 332 (91%) 33 (9%)
≥10% 386 139 (36%) 247 (64%)
(b)
SnF2 <10% 400 397 (99%) 3 (1%)
≥10% 348 246 (71%) 102 (29%)
Pos Control <10% 363 354 (98%) 9 (2%)
≥10% 331 152 (46%) 179 (54%)

(a) Subjects with localized or generalized gingivitis had 3.7 times better odds (95% CI [2.8, 5.0]) of shifting to generally healthy (<10% bleeding) using SnF2 versus a negative control.

(b) Subjects with localized or generalized gingivitis had 2.8 times better odds (95% CI [2.1, 3.9]) of shifting to generally healthy (<10% bleeding) using SnF2 versus a positive control.